
NEW
LIGHT ON AN OLD, OLD STORY:
JESUS’ BIRTH AT BETHLEHEM
‘In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the
world should be enrolled. This was the first enrollment, when Quirinius was
governor of Syria. And all went to be enrolled, each to his own city. And Joseph
also went up from Galilee, from the city of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city
of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage
of David, to be enrolled with Mary, his betrothed who was with child. And while
they were there, the time came for her to be delivered. And she gave birth to
her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger,
because there was no room for them in the inn’ (Luke 2:1-7).
For many of us, these words evoke the isolation, harshness, and difficulty which
Mary and Joseph must have faced at Jesus’ birth. Images of cold, windswept,
winter hills in Bethlehem, overcrowded inns, and a futile attempt to find housing
in a strange city paint a bleak picture of the first Christmas, one that fills
our Western hearts with sympathy for the new mother and her babe.
And yet, the circumstances of the first Christmas may not have been as bleak
as we sometimes think. Understanding that Jewish society at the time of Jesus’
birth was traditional and eastern, several questions arise when we read this
passage, questions that receive a fresh answer in this context.
The Judean Connection When Joseph and his pregnant wife Mary made
the journey to Bethlehem, they were returning to his ancestral home, the place
where his family originated and in which, undoubtedly, some relatives still
lived. From the gospels and early church historians we see glimpses of the network
of relatives that Joseph and Mary had living in Judea: Zachariah and Elizabeth
lived near Jerusalem; John the Baptist ministered in the Judean wilderness;
and Jesus’ brother James later became the head of the Jerusalem church
and was well respected by all the Jews living in Jerusalem.
The Family Home The family in traditional societies is made up
of an extended group of people, with a patriarch at the head. Married children
and their children usually lived with or near the father and mother. The authority
and protection of the father extended to them and their respect and obedience
was expected in return (cf. Luke 15). Relatives from other towns were welcomed
by the patriarch and brought under his protection during their stay in his village.
The House The architecture of the family home both today and in
antiquity made provision for the occasional guest. The most common dwelling
was the courtyard home which was multi-levelled. A lower room or cellar was
used as a storeroom. In the hilly areas like Bethlehem, a cave adjacent to the
courtyard might often be adapted for this purpose. Here the family’s prized
or more vulnerable animals could be fed and sheltered at night, protected from
the cold, thieves and predators. The main living area, partitioned into several
sections, was on an upper level. It had a work and kitchen area, where the children
often slept, and a separate bedroom for the parents. In a wealthier home, a
third room would be added for guests and for entertaining. In Luke 2:7 the Greek
kataluma can be translated either ‘inn’ or ‘guest room’
and may have referred to this room in the family home. The latter translation
is to be preferred in light of the cultural and societal backdrop of Jewish
family life. (It is worthwhile to note that later in Luke, the word kataluma
is translated ‘upper room’ or ‘guest room’ [Luke 22:11-12]
whereas Luke uses the word pundakeion to mean ‘inn’ in the
story of the Good Samaritan [Luke 10:34.)
The Christmas Story These facts may shed new light on the circumstances
surrounding Jesus birth. The evangelist presents the picture of a census in
Luke 2:1-7, in which all heads of household had to return to their cities of
origin. For Joseph, it was Bethlehem. When they arrived, Joseph most likely
went straight to his paternal home, seeking the help and protection of his relatives
currently living there, and received it, for Mary was pregnant and Jewish custom
would demand such a response. Some time passed, and ‘the time came for
her to be delivered’.
Bethlehem—and this family’s guest room—were full of relatives
and no private place existed for her to deliver her baby. No private place,
that is, until someone had the bright and compassionate idea to suggest that
she could have the baby down below, away from the crowded kataluma, in
the warmth of the storeroom and animal’s cellar, and yet still be within
the security of the family home. Jesus was safely born ‘in the city of
David’ as the angels told the shepherds (2:11), and laid in a manger or
feeding trough. That a child should be found lying in a manger was unique, and
yet it may have reflected, not a situation of abandonment and isolation, but
one of compassion and protection and of the order of family life in traditional
Jewish society of the first century AD. It is interesting to note that the traditional
site of Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem is in the middle of the city,
where the family homes would have stood in antiquity, and not in the surrounding
countryside.
The Weather Just a closing word on the weather! It must not have
been too cold that night, since the shepherds and their flocks were out in the
fields, as we read in Luke 2:8. In really cold weather, the sheep are kept indoors
at night and graze outside during the day. So Jesus was probably born in mild
weather.
These facts combine to create a warmer picture of the circumstances of Jesus’
birth. Mary and Joseph were not necessarily abandoned and alone in a strange
city, but were likely incorporated into the larger, extended family of Joseph’s
relatives where they found shelter, compassion, and protection on that special
night when their precious baby was born.
© Stephen and Claire Pfann, University of the Holy Land, 1993